GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Arsenikk (talk) 09:39, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

I am passing the article, trusting you look into the issues above; the disambig is the only instance which breaches the GA criteria, the rest is mere copyediting. Arsenikk (talk) 09:39, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]