This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Index
|
||
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
This topic is in need of attention from an expert on the subject. The section or sections that need attention may be noted in a message below. |
I'm thinking the lead should have a brief blurb about the nature and history of Christian punk, similar to the hardcore and metal lists, but I don't really know that much about the genre. Does anyone know of any sources that would be good for this?--Invisiboy42293 (talk) 18:31, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
According to its article, glam metal "combines elements of [hard rock and heavy metal] with punk rock". The article later reiterates that glam metal incorporates "elements of punk rock", for which it cites this source (result 2). Another source seems to also imply the connection. If either of these is valid enough, should we add Christian glam metal bands to the article? If so, where? (I was thinking of giving them their own section, but I'm open to other ideas.)--Invisiboy42293 (talk) 23:14, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
So... why are bands like Owl City (That's not punk. At all. Most of his music doesn't even use but a keyboard. The source doesn't even say Christian punk, it says faith-based synth-pop), Paramore (I could have swore that they stated that their members just happen to be Christian, as was Switchfoot. Also no source for Paramore), and U2 (do I need to explain myself? They have two Christian members and a non-Christian member and are not punk) listed when bands like Antiskeptic aren't? The Juliana Theory is even listed, when the article for that band even says that they are not a Christian band. Mae is listed. The bloody Jonas Brothers are listed. Like... really? I'm not going to edit this article, because I'm seriously interested in the reasoning behind this. Is anyone confused as to what Punk and Christian punk is in either the musical or subcultural context (not in a rude way, I mean that honestly, the articles are pretty decent)? Or are people just putting in bands tongue-in-cheek? We should find sources that directly label these bands as "Christian Punk," and not go around adding bands with loose sources. If you can't call them punk in their own articles, or even Christian punk, then why would it need to be on this list? 98.198.85.83 (talk) 13:37, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
So, Walter Görlitz, going back through the discussions I realize that I am now a very different editor than I was 3-4 years ago. Do you want to revisit the band listings here, or is the division of listings under different subgenres (and thus not putting glossy "pop-punk" bands next to MxPx) satisfactory to you?--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 14:33, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on List of Christian punk bands. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template ((source check))
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:09, 24 December 2017 (UTC)