A2: A few topics have several facets, only some of which are described by
reliable sources as pseudoscience; multiple notable descriptions or points of view may be appropriately included as described in
Wikipedia:Fringe theories. On the other hand, proponents of a particular topic characterized as pseudoscience almost always self-report as engaging in science. The several points of view should be weighted according to the reliability of the sources making each claim. Advocacy sources are reliable only for their own opinions - it is okay to state that Dr. X claims to have built a creature under the usual caveats for
self-published sources, but the creature's exploits should be described as reported in independent sources. If the majority of scientists would be surprised by a claim,
it is probably not mainstream science.