Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
I will do the GA Reassessment on this article as part of the GA Sweeps project. H1nkles (talk) 17:42, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The lead needs to be expanded to summarize all aspects of the article per WP:Lead. Also information found in the lead should be found in the article. Most of the lead is not mentioned in the article at all.
- Why is the image of Litchfield in the References section? This isn't the right place for the image.
- photo relocated, images updated. CrazyPaco (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Are there any notable traditions that go on in these buildings during the school year?
- I am not aware of any long standing notable traditions (that are supported by verifiable citations) directly related to the Towers, but that will be researched further. CrazyPaco (talk) 19:25, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- What about notable people that lived in these buildings - references verifying this may be hard to find but would be necessary.
- This would be nearly impossible to determine. No university sources are known to exist to be able to supply this information. CrazyPaco (talk) 19:25, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- What prompted the building of these towers?
- How much did it cost to build? There are quite a few items that should be covered to make the article comprehensive.
- $14m...added. CrazyPaco (talk) 00:22, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Is there an image of the interior of one of the dorms?
- No, a request for such an image has been pending on the Pitt Wikiproject for some time. CrazyPaco (talk) 19:25, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The hours for the restaurants isn't really important information and it is a one-sentence paragraph, which is frowned upon.
- Removed. CrazyPaco (talk) 19:25, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Many of your references don't have a publisher or an accessdate, these are minimum requirements for referencing websites.
- Repaired. CrazyPaco (talk) 21:13, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Refs 1 and 9 are dead and need to be repaired.
- Repaired. Note that two references are off-line, unarchived (on the internet) historical resources.CrazyPaco (talk) 21:14, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
There are several issues with this article that need to be addressed if the article is to maintain its GA Status. For your reference here is the GA Criteria. I will notify all interested editors and projects that I am putting the article on hold for a week pending work. If you have any questions or concerns please feel free to contact me on my talk page. H1nkles (talk) 18:08, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Many of these issues can be addressed, but it may take some time to do suitable research depending on available free time.CrazyPaco (talk) 19:25, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- No problem, the important thing is that someone is working on it. I can extend the hold if necessary. Just keep me posted. H1nkles (talk) 20:16, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The issues appear to have been addressed I will keep at GA. Congrats. H1nkles (talk) 15:46, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]