This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: |
|||||||||||
|
The content of this article has been derived in whole or part from lindsayangelo.com/thinkingcont/strategic-thinking-training. Permission has been received from the copyright holder to release this material under both the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported license and the GNU Free Documentation License. You may use either or both licenses. Evidence of this has been confirmed and stored by VRT volunteers, under ticket number 2022080310001401. This template is used by approved volunteers dealing with the Wikimedia volunteer response team system (VRTS) after receipt of a clear statement of permission at permissions-enwikimedia.org. Do not use this template to claim permission. |
What is this? Needs work or deletion — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.151.28.249 (talk • contribs) 11:15, 1 June 2005 (UTC)
This is not a 'core method' of McKinsey. It is an logical grouping principle, which is used in a lot of analysis work. I'm not sure this even originates from McKinsey, but we'd need a reference to validate that. I do think this is a valid entry in wikipedia because it is a often applied grouping / ordering principle. 217.166.53.82 (talk) 16:27, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
Some potential references for your consideration
Also here is an early academic article on the topics. Not sure of it is the first though. On Mutually Exclusive and Collectively Exhaustive Properties of Demand Functions Malachy Carey Economica New Series, Vol. 48, No. 192 (Nov., 1981), pp. 407-415 (article consists of 9 pages) Published by: Blackwell Publishing on behalf of The London School of Economics and Political Science and The Suntory and Toyota International Centres for Economics and Related Disciplines Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2553697 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Craigwbrown (talk • contribs) 18:42, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
After reading Van Gelder's article, I think it
The argument Van Gelder makes, that MECE is not collectively exhaustive
I hope this justifies removing the reference or adding clarification. 60.52.66.151 (talk) 08:21, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
I added some references to the McKinsey Way series but these were deleted. Please add your thoughts here. Please don't only put them in the edit comments and my talk page as you did here . The reason is I'm going to ask for a WP:3O so I need to point the third opinion editor to this section. Thanks! Woz2 (talk) 11:59, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
OK Will do. Woz2 (talk) 17:07, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
I removed your contribution here because it was only a list of books without any information about the topic. This is an article about MECE, not about books. As I recommended on your talk page, please add content about MECE from the books and use them as sources. Thanks. Jojalozzo 17:50, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
I also replaced content that was removed without an edit comment. Jojalozzo 18:01, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
As the article states, MECE is just a concept within the broader idea of Minto’s Pyramid Principle. With that in mind, I propose renaming the article to ‘Pyramid Principle’.
Can anyone propose a good idea NOT to do this? ollee (talk) 09:49, 22 February 2021 (UTC)