GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Mark Arsten (talk · contribs) 17:18, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

LOC?
Library of Congress Paratrooper450 (talk) 00:29, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Got it. What kind of link are you envisioning, Mark? -- Khazar2 (talk) 01:23, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I was thinking a link like in the source field of File:25100v.jpg. Not strictly necessary, but would be good to have
It looks like they do have those links in the tags if this is what you're looking for: [1] [2] -- Khazar2 (talk) 19:00, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Early life

I don't know that this has been lost to history necessarily, but I couldn't turn it up in the various sources I read. This encyclopedia article on her, for example, just mentions it generically, which seems typical.[3]]
I will look through Goodwin's book tonight to see if she offers anything more concrete. Paratrooper450 (talk) 00:29, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! -- Khazar2 (talk) 01:23, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Not a big deal, but would be nice if we could find out. Mark Arsten (talk) 16:52, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Secretary to Roosevelt

I don't remember any of my sources covering that--it's a good question, but one I don't have an answer to.
Her White House title was "Private Secretary to the President" but she was a government employee. In the 1938 edition of the "Official Register of the United States" she is listed on page 10, which notes she received an annual salary of $5,000 Paratrooper450 (talk) 00:29, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, Paratrooper. Mark, what would be your suggestion for how to work in the above? All it proves conclusively is that she was on the govt. payroll in 1938, but it seems safe to assume that she was throughout her tenure as a presidential secretary. -- Khazar2 (talk) 01:23, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Good question, I'd suggest something a little vague like "During Roosevelt's tenure as president, LeHand became a government employee." Do you think that would work? Mark Arsten (talk) 16:59, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Sounds good to me. Will add it now. -- Khazar2 (talk) 19:00, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I don't recall encountering any of these specifics in my sources. It must surely have happened, and happened often, but the problem is LeHand is usually treated only in summary in materials focused on FDR and ER; I didn't turn up any books specific to her. There is a book out there by LeHand's successor/assistant Grace Tully, which might have more detailed anecdotes about LeHand, but I don't have a copy.
Interesting, this would probably need to be used if it went for featured status, but isn't needed to be passed as a good article. Mark Arsten (talk) 16:52, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Done.
Done.
Done.
Done.
I think I encountered a speculative reference that LeHand probably wasn't thrilled about it, but it was weak enough that I didn't think it was worth including. I couldn't find anything more detailed than that. She was loyal, so she wouldn't have said much on the record, and because she went down with a stroke before the end of his presidency, left no memoirs.
She burned her letters. Paratrooper450 (talk) 00:29, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, understandable. Mark Arsten (talk) 16:52, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I couldn't find this, unfortunately.

Relationship with Roosevelt

Done.
Done.

Later illness and death

Done.

SS Marguerite LeHand

Done.
Slightly reduced.

References/Bibliography

Done.
Done. Thanks for pointing that out, I didn't realize the template could do that.
Looks like you got that one. That was in from a previous editor, I think.
Done.

A couple more minor comments that don't affect GA status:

Thanks for the close copyediting--much appreciated.-- Khazar2 (talk) 19:56, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, at this point, I've concluded that this meets the GA criteria--good work! Interesting to read about a less-known figure like this, I wonder how famous she would have been had she gotten that close to a president nowadays? Mark Arsten (talk) 18:32, 11 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

$100 million book deal for sure. Thanks for the review and the copyedits! -- Khazar2 (talk) 19:02, 11 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
No problem, my pleasure. Mark Arsten (talk) 19:17, 11 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Glad to have been a part of this. I keep finding more material, which I will continue to add as I'm able.Paratrooper450 (talk) 13:56, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]