Reviewer:IPadPerson (talk·contribs) 14:49, 4 January 2015 (UTC) I think that this article has everything in good shape to be promoted. All of the sources are reliable, the writing is correct, and there are no copyright violations. Any other input? - IPadPerson (talk) 14:49, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Quick comment Why isn't there a stand-alone page for Trainor's discography? I think her discography has enough information to have its separate article. Simon (talk) 12:09, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@HĐ and Lips Are Movin: Though it is not by just one user's opinion. I myself believe that the discography shall stay in Trainor's bio. Over the time, consensus has been made in favour of such. --Maranofan13:42, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: IPadPerson, since you initiated the review, it is you who must leave comments on how to improve the article. If you feel the article is well-written enough, all information is reliably sourced, the article includes all major aspects without going into excessive detail, is neutral, is stable, and (if possible) illustrated by appropriately licensed and relevant images, you may pass the article for GA. See WP:Good article nominations/Instructions#Reviewing and feel free to ask other editors who have conducted GA reviews (such as myself) if you have any questions and/or need assistance reviewing. Snuggums (talk / edits) 04:01, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The pair offered the track to various record labels and recording artists, including Beyoncé and Adele, to which they were unsuccessful --> I would suggest using "which proved unsuccessful" to make it sound more persistent.
Done
Period should be removed from the section's picture caption per WP:CAPFRAG.
I've had an eye on this article for a bit. Have to agree with Snuggums. The article needs a bit of work in the first place, and the lack of stability is enough to fail it for now, with no opposition from me for a renomination in at least a month. Gloss06:42, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@SNUGGUMS and Gloss: Please, can't we not fail this now. A lot of work has clearly been put in c/e. Also, the article is in good shape. The content doesn't change "significantly" according to me and the recent additions have been a result of Title's release :(--Maranofan07:33, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry Marano, but unstable articles are an automatic fail according to GA criteria. It's unstable right now because of an ongoing content dispute, not because of the recent updates for her album. Snuggums (talk / edits) 07:35, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]