![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
Who added that, and what is your source?
The link erroneously goes to the Durham Transit website. Correction needed.
Image:Refuel2.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 04:18, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
Was it necessary to change the page from Mississauga Transit to MiWay? The system was know as MT for over 40 years, and frankly I doubt that "MiWay" is going to last even ten… Useddenim (talk) 13:24, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
The facilities and services sections are now lengthy tables that break up the flow of the article. WoOuld anyone object if I move the text section that now follow them up before these sections so that the text sections can be easily read together, and then be followed by the tables that list specific details of the system? I think this would improve the flow of the article without removing any information. Ground Zero | t 13:36, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
I think there should be a part of the article that talks about discontinued routes like 2 (Hurontario). Information can be obtained from websites like cpdtb.ca. Spbone (talk) 21:49, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on MiWay. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template ((source check))
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:59, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
Wikipedia is not the place for lists of indiscriminate details on bus fleets. Not only that the section was entirely unsourced. The editor who re-instated the revert added All Information which has been listed on the fleet section has been given by reliable sources on both CPTDB Wiki, Facebook, and from others. I'll remind them that all of those are not reliable sources. Ajf773 (talk) 08:47, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
Should we have these routes removed from the list of routes under the Transitway Stations table? Or are we keeping them there for historic reasons? Miway.photos (talk) 22:38, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
The City of Mississauga release a bid awhile back that is currently still active, this is for a study of a new area that could be developed as a new garage for the storage of buses, particularly electric ones. Should we include this in the Wiki page along with a citation? Miway.photos (talk) 23:27, 2 June 2023 (UTC)