Not done This article quick fails as it has two extreme problems:

1. No images, for it to be GA it must have at least one image.
2. It has the ((Globalize/USA)) template, so it is not a fair and unbiased article, and is not broad enough.

-- Cheers mate! CYCLONICWHIRLWIND ^talk 14:39, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it well written?

   A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:

   B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:

2. Is it verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check?

   A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:

   B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):

   C. It contains no original research:

   D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:

   B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):

4. Is it neutral?

   It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:

5. Is it stable?

   It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:

6. Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?

   A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:

   B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

I will review this article, but others are of course welcome to review this as well. -- Cheers mate! CYCLONICWHIRLWIND ^talk 14:28, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have now reviewed this article, please feel free to argue with what I have said. -- Cheers mate! CYCLONICWHIRLWIND ^talk 14:39, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]