This article was nominated for deletion on 5 July 2020. The result of the discussion was redirect.

This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This redirect has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter. Cats This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Cats. This project provides a central approach to Cat-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.CatsWikipedia:WikiProject CatsTemplate:WikiProject CatsCats articles

Tabby isn't a breed, it's a coat pattern. 83.104.249.240 (talk) 14:58, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This article seemed of poor quality to me, so I've decided to be be bold and heavily re-write it. I have:

• Generally cleaned up the sentences, making the article easier to read
• Cut the line about "cat years" from the intro; there isn't really a reliable source for 32 cat years being 144 "human years", and other articles for old animals don't include such lines.
• Removed "He was not our cat, we were his humans and he never lets us forget that. I think that was the secret to his long life."
• Removed the lines about what Nutmeg liked to eat
• Removed this source since, after the previous 2 bullet points, it no longer had a place in the article.
• Re-organized the Death section to be in chronological order.

I think this is a step in the right direction but it still leaves a few issues. For one, the already stubby article is now even shorter. I don't really know how to make it longer. I considered adding a section about the cat's life and moving the quotes from the owner there, but I didn't feel there was enough content to populate an entire section. Second is that I don't know how to properly address the concern that "tabby" isn't a breed. On the page Domestic short-haired cat, it states that "The term tabby cat technically refers to a coat pattern, but is also often used as a general term for cats of this sort." Wondering Wanderer (talk) 21:36, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Adding to the issues above, I can't help but express concern that BoredPanda.com isn't a valid source for Wikipedia. It's clickbait more than anything. B.Rossow · talk 15:20, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]