GA Review

[edit]
  • I don't know how to update the tag.
  • Done.
  • Done.
  • Where pop is population and %t is % change.
  • Done.
  • perhaps a way to do this would be to put more of the detailed history timeline into the article History of Omaha so that the history topic does not overshadow the geography section and so on. The history section is the only one formatted into a timeline compared to the other sections which only deal with their topics and not in a timeline fashion, and this causes the repeats perhaps. So smuush the entirety of the history information including its subsections into a smaller history section, about the same size as the next longest section...culture. That would help the length of the Omaha article be shorter, would improve the history of Omaha article, and would help show that all the various contributing topics of Omaha are important to Omaha.
  • Something to do is to take the lead and copy and paste just the lead into a different page or place. Only read it as if it were featured on wikipedia and the lead is on the main page and nothing else of the article. Does the lead introduce the WWW reader to ALL sections of the article, so if I was to write a report for a teacher on topic X about Omaha I would know that this lead paragraph will point me to more info in section labelled topic X in the main part of the article itself.
*add the URL for reference 21 -23 -24 -28-30-31-35-36-38-106-The Gate City: A history of Omaha.
  • The fact The Union Pacific Railroad was founded in Omaha in 1867 was cited as reference 22. Reference 22 is an awesome article about Thomas Clark Durant (1820-1885) but no date of the founding of the UPR was given in the whole article.  :-(
    • The new reference also does not say anything about 1867  :-(
  • Done, twice. I rewrote the sentences and added new citations.
  • Done.
  • Check out advise on leads for placenames...guidelines, guidelines
  • As per guidelines, a government section would be handy...and again some more tips on how to flesh out the geography section...Short sections and paragraphs are discouraged. (GA criteria)
  • Left-aligned images should not be placed at the start of subsections.
  • References should be consistently formatted, eg. consistent author format, abbreviations for "page number", etc. compare reference 188 to the others.
  • I believe this is done.
GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
I believe the requests of your review have been met. What's the next step? • Freechild'sup? 12:13, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
There are many many references which are awesome...some have went away, will putter away at the rest in the morning.
  • Replaced.
  • Replaced
  • Replaced.
  • Replaced.
  • Replaced.
  • Replaced.
  • Replaced.

SriMesh | talk 05:39, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • Replaced.
  • Replaced.

I couldn't get this link to come up, it continually timed out.

  • Replaced.
  • Replaced.

The 'media' section is too short and does not meet the completeness criterion. It looks like the contents of the "see also" link Media in Omaha, Nebraska is mostly a list of radio & tv stations, which is fine. But you should say more about the media in the Omaha article itself, than simply, "The city also has four television news stations." See the Media and Popular Culture" section of the Flagstaff, Arizona article for an example. You can talk about the media market, and provide a citation, and discuss (in prose) the major television stations there. Some information on movies and tv shows might be good to include, too, but be careful not to just use a bulleted list for that (it's bordering on "trivia"). Dr. Cash (talk) 16:25, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]