This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Patentlyo (blog) redirect. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This is a blog about patent law. Apparently the person requesting speedy deletion believes that U.S. Patent Law is less important than "cute animals." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cute_Overload
No, the requester believes that blogs are less important than cute animals. I probably agree, on the grounds that there are fewer cute animals! Seriously, you need to give some indication that this blog has garnered the attention of mainstream media. DJ Clayworth (talk) 21:13, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
Speedy deletion is declined. However this seems to have very little content. It would appear that a merge into Dennis Crouch might be appropriate. DJ Clayworth (talk) 22:06, 28 May 2009 (UTC) Also the capitalization of the blog name seems to be "PatentlyO" or sometimes "Patently-O". Also there is no article Patentlyo or PatentlyO so the "(blog)" suffix is unnecessary. A rename is probably in order. DJ Clayworth (talk) 22:08, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
There was no substantive content here that wasn't already at Dennis Crouch, and little evidence that the blog itself is notable independent from its author. Simply redirected to Dennis Crouch. --ZimZalaBim talk 16:43, 29 May 2009 (UTC)