This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Phimosis article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 90 days ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: |
||||||||||
|
![]() | Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Phimosis.
|
Would it be correct to say that the image depicts a severe phimosis? Of course, any image should clearly demonstrate the phenomenon being described. But the layperson may interpret it to be a typical depiction of a phimosis, which, if I understand correctly, is not accurate.
Perhaps the caption should be changed to "A severe phimosis" to clarify the example is more demonstrative than typical. 85.255.236.218 (talk) 10:26, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
I have removed two images from this article. The infobox image is captioned "an erect penis with phimosis" so I have removed another image that was identical. I left in the one captioned "a physiological case" in case someone wants to differentiate physiological and pathological. I removed the "typical case" because there is no distinction made between that and the remaining images. (WP:NOTGALLERY) Kimen8 (talk) 14:08, 12 December 2023 (UTC)