This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Iran, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles related to Iran on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project where you can contribute to the discussions and help with our open tasks.IranWikipedia:WikiProject IranTemplate:WikiProject IranIran articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
In that section, I've noticed a paragraph that read like this:
Regarding the issues raised in this telephone conversation, the President of Iran said that the discussion I had with Obama was mainly the nuclear issue. I said that "this issue is not only the right of the Iranian people but also a part of the national pride of the Iranian". He continued: Regarding the P5 + 1, I said that "with the opportunity created by the Iranian nation, this opportunity should be used and expedited in this matter", so the President of the United States said: "I instruct the Secretary of State to expedite this matter;" Our main focus was to move faster on the nuclear issue. After the call, Barack Obama said on a television program: "Just now, I spoke on the phone with President Rouhani. Our conversation was about the current actions and efforts to reach an agreement on Iran's nuclear program.
It isn't proper to use first-person pronouns in mainspace articles like that, as that might confuse some readers. – MrPersonHumanGuy (talk) 16:19, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@MrPersonHumanGuy: The text exists since the first version of the article, which is described as a translation from the Farsi-language Wikipedia. Probably you'd need to find an independent translation for comparison. --CiaPan (talk) 16:59, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved
– at least I think.
(I should've put this up when I did that corrective edit the other day) – MrPersonHumanGuy (talk) 11:55, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]