GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Pic-Nic/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: GhostRiver (talk · contribs) 17:42, 1 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]


I think this article has been waiting at GAN for long enough! — GhostRiver 17:42, 1 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

Infobox and lede

Done
Done
Done
Done
Done

History

Origins at Brenner's Folk

Done
Done
Done
Done
Done
Done

Breakthrough with "Callate nina"

Done
Done
Done
Done
Done
Done
Done
Done
Done
Done
Done

Break-up and aftermath

Done
Done
Done
Done
Done
Done
Done

Musical style

Done
Done
Done
Done
Done

Legacy

See corrections
See corrections
Done
Done
Done
Done
Done
Done
Done
Done

Discography

References

General comments

Generally looks good – outside of some basic prose and MOS fixes, my biggest concern is in the Legacy section, where WP:WEASEL may apply, as claims are made generally about the band's status. Putting on hold now to allow nominator to address comments; feel free to ping me with questions, and let me know when you're finished. — GhostRiver 18:11, 1 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

GhostRiver thank you so much for taking a look at the article! Regarding the main issues in the "Legacy" section, please let me know if I've fixed them correctly. --🩸 𝗕𝗹𝗲𝗳𝗳 🩸 (talk) 19:01, 1 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
So much better, thank you! Very happy to pass! — GhostRiver 19:24, 1 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]