This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Radio Stations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of radio stations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Radio StationsWikipedia:WikiProject Radio StationsTemplate:WikiProject Radio StationsRadio station articles
Not sure if this subject is sufficiently notable but maybe it will be soon... in any case the WP:COI tag seems unnecessary... WP:WHYCOI? -- samjinout 17:14, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
If you look at the article history, it was created by User:Pulzar who is clearly the owner/operator of the station. While this would not be an issue if the article had full independent sourcing, the article does contain many unsourced claims including some relating to its notablity ("one of the higher profile low power radio stations in Christchurch"). dramatic (talk) 20:22, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Yup, fair call - let's leave the ((COI)) tag there until citations are added or claims are removed. -- samjinout 05:09, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I've significantly modified the article to remove the unsubstantiated claims and propaganda. The station has begun broadcast again today, and as such many of the claims that were present to boost the stations importance even though it wasn't broadcasting have become irrelevant and I have removed them with the aim of making this article balanced. I know that no substantiation of aome of these claims exists (I do know the founders). I have removed the COI tag as this article is now balanced and does not claim any extravagant unsourced claims. altitudinous (talk) 14:55, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Pulzar FM. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add ((cbignore)) after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add ((nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot)) to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template ((source check)) (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.