Former good articleRobert Logan (naval architect) was one of the Engineering and technology good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
October 27, 2020Good article nomineeListed
February 26, 2023Good article reassessmentDelisted
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on July 9, 2017.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the naval architect Robert Logan designed the first steel train ferry?
Current status: Delisted good article
WikiProject iconBiography Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis page is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.
???This page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.


GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Robert Logan (naval architect)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: MWright96 (talk · contribs) 15:28, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Am reviewing for the GAN October 2020 Backlog Drive. MWright96 (talk) 15:28, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Images


Lead



Early life


  •  Done Did extensive research on this, however none of the sources say.--Doug Coldwell (talk) 14:24, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Mid life and career







Logan boats

















Personal life





References







Will put the review on hold to allow the nominator to address or query the suggestions raised above. MWright96 (talk) 18:19, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Working Thanks for review. Will be addressing these over the next few days. --Doug Coldwell (talk) 20:50, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • @MWright96: All issues have been addressed. Can you take another look. Thanks.--Doug Coldwell (talk) 10:49, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Doug Coldwell: Now promoting to GA class. MWright96 (talk) 12:46, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Reviewer should have given closer attention to the items in §Sources. For example, this one. I note these issues:
  • The short-form citation calls out page 309; the google url in the citation links to someplace in the source that is labeled as page 30.
  • It is presumed that the citation is to Logan's obituary where no author is named so |last=Naval Architects is improper
  • The title of the source is Transactions of The Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers 1918 not Society of Naval Architects which is the publisher
So, for the example, it would be better to write:
((cite book |section=Obituaries |title=Transactions of The Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers 1918 |url=https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=njp.32101050820032&view=1up&seq=353|date=1919 |location=New York |publisher=Society of Naval Architects |page=309 |ref=((sfnref|Naval Architects|1919))))
"Obituaries". Transactions of The Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers 1918. New York: Society of Naval Architects. 1919. p. 309.
It took me about an hour to noodle all this out. The purpose of citations is to point readers to the source that supports the en.wiki article; not to send them on a treasure hunt.
I haven't looked closely but the other two citations in §Sources need similar revision.
—Trappist the monk (talk) 13:41, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright contributor investigation and Good article reassessment[edit]

This article is part of Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/20210315 and the Good article (GA) drive to reassess and potentially delist over 200 GAs that might contain copyright and other problems. An AN discussion closed with consensus to delist this group of articles en masse, unless a reviewer opens an independent review and can vouch for/verify content of all sources. Please review Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/February 2023 for further information about the GA status of this article, the timeline and process for delisting, and suggestions for improvements. Questions or comments can be made at the project talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:36, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]