This article is written in Canadian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, centre, travelled, realize, analyze) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Canada: Saskatchewan / Geography / Communities / Saskatchewan communities / The 10,000 Challenge Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Saskatchewan. This article is supported by WikiProject Geography of Canada. This article is supported by WikiProject Canadian communities. This article is supported by WikiProject Saskatchewan communities. This article was created or improved during The 10,000 Challenge of WikiProject Canada, which started in November 2016 and is ongoing. You can help!!

from VfD:

Sherwood No. 159, Saskatchewan

Non-notable. Vanity. DCEdwards1966 05:22, Jan 11, 2005 (UTC)

• Delete, Keep this saska-cruft. Wyss 05:31, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• I don't see how this can be called a vanity article, since it's about a geographic area. Very very marginal keep only if someone goes in and removes the unnecessary "from living there" comment and adds some content to bring it in line with the other articles on towns in Saskatchewan. Either that, or create an article listing the rural municipalities in Saskatchewan and leave it at that. 23skidoo 05:36, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  • I called it vanity because it was written by someone that lives there. DCEdwards1966 05:46, Jan 11, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete --fvw* 07:30, 2005 Jan 11 (UTC)
  • Keep --fvw* 10:03, 2005 Jan 11 (UTC)
• The article submitted was a one-sentence substub... about a real life 720 sq km municipality; a well-off exurb surrounding Regina, the capital of Saskatchewan. It was expandible to discuss physical geography, industry, population and demographics. I've written four short paragraphs and two external links doing so, and it still has room to grow (in each area listed, history, population distribution, transport links, etc., etc.) Should this still be here? Keep. Samaritan 09:38, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Keep!. Move to Cleanup. Real place. RickK 09:39, Jan 11, 2005 (UTC)
• Article has been improved. Keep. --YUL89YYZ 09:58, Jan 11, 2005 (UTC)
• Keep CJCurrie 17:24, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• strong keep this is much better than the articles for many larger places in the USA. Thryduulf 18:16, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Keep the rewritten article. DCEdwards1966 18:57, Jan 11, 2005 (UTC)
• Keep all real places. VfD is not cleanup. GRider\^talk 19:16, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Keep in its current form. --Deathphoenix 21:16, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Weak Delete, borderline notability, needs cleanup and expansion if it stays. Megan1967 04:27, 12 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Keep in its current form Capitalistroadster 10:07, 12 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Keep in some form or another, if no appropriate merge can be found. Average Earthman 16:44, 12 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Since when did we start deleting articles on real geographic locales? Yes, the place has a stupid name, but it really exists. Bearcat 04:26, 15 Jan 2005 (UTC)

• Keep Spinboy 05:23, 15 Jan 2005 (UTC)

end moved discussion