Passed. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 06:38, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
I'd been hoping someone would have picked this up by now so that the DYK and GA reviewers were not the same. Alas, we're here six months later. Not much to be done, though I'd like to see a passage reworded.
It is reasonably well written.
a. (prose, spelling, and grammar):
One suggestion to rework a sentence with four commas.
During the 2003 gas conflict, Aguilar led mobilizations against the government of Gonzalo Sánchez de Lozada, rejecting the sale of natural gas to Chile and calling for the convocation of a constituent assembly to reform the Constitution, two demands that proved successful in the ensuing years. I wonder if with all these commas the last comma should be an emdash/endash.
Is there any information on Aguilar's activities after 2015?
None that I could find. Many individuals who entered parliament as organizational representatives rather than party partisans don't tend to lead publicly active lives once out of office. Krisgabwoosh (talk) 22:31, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
One other thing. The passage from Romero Ballivián Las dificultades que tuvo la Asamblea para redactar la Constitución, el prolongado empantamiento alrededor de las cuestiones procedimentales y el limitado debate sobre asuntos medulares restringieron la proyección de liderazgos desde ese escenario. Aproximadamente un décimo de los asambleístas prosiguió una carrera política nacional is remarkably close to Throughout the Constituent Assembly's existence, prolonged procedural stalemate and limited debate made it difficult for most constituents to project a national image, leading few to continue political careers following its closure.. I see that the book states, Se autoriza la reproducción total o parcial del contenido con la debida inclusión y cita de la fuente. We have the citations, but I wonder if there could be some rephrasing here.
Reworded. Its still a bit close, but no longer word-for-word. Krisgabwoosh (talk) 22:31, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.