This level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Uh... i don't believe all international traffic is concentrated in Pudong... just have to check Colipon 04:40, 7 Nov 2003 (UTC)
How long is the terminal?--Arado 15:15, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
Is this about to become China's busiest airport or what? Colipon+(T) 05:00, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
Exactly what is the significance of the bit about Continental and direct New York services? Does seem out of place, I' suggest that is removed Ianguy 01:36, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
Since there's a section about Continental's wishes for a flight to Shanghai from New York (or Newark), I think that there should be some info on China Eastern Airline's direct flight from New York.
Please consider moving all the alternate information in the lead (different languages and scripts etc) and put them in the infobox instead.--Filll 17:30, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
To se the stage: RNA takes a B757, flies it from KTM, lands in PVG, and continues on to KIX. Then it turns around, flies back to PVG, then on to KTM.
First, the "Osaka-Kansai" entry was removed from this article.[1] Doubting the accuracy of this edit, i searched for evidence and found that RNA flies to KIX, from PVG, once a week, for sure.[2] I personally know an employee at KIX that serves that airline. Therefore, i reverted that edit.[3]
Now, Elektrik Blue 82 has reverted that edit,[4] remarking "rv: true, RA flies KIX-PVG-KTM, but it has no rights to transport pax between Japan and China, so it is unbookable".
So, who's right? I say that i am, because in plain terms, RNA flies to KIX from PVG. Elektrik says that the subtleties of transportation regulations limiting the ability of a Japanese person to fly to China via this flight means that even though a flight happens, we shouldn't list it. I disagree.
On the KIX page, it says RNA flies to PVG. Should that be removed as well, or perhaps it should say "Kathmandu (via Shanghai)".
I don't know the answer, but i think we should list the flight, and let the airline explain to the passenger the appropriate regulations and restrictions on passengers.
Image:LogoShanghaiAirport.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:15, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
Uhh, I don't think this was reviewed as passed as a Good Article. If this article has gone through the official process, please link to the relevant discussion. --Ideogram 19:14, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
routes awarded and someone updated the article.
There is a list of destinations, including Maxjet (Seattle), Northwest (Detroit), United (Los Angeles), and others that are marked as pending government approval. Some of these applications will be denied because not all of them can be granted under the limitations of the air service agreement between the U.S. and the People's Republic of China. The number of flights are limited. Not all airlines asking for route authority can be accommodated under the agreement.
Editors should decide whether to leave the article as it is, make a note that the flights are subject to approval and that their are limitations preventing all of the applications from being approved, to delete the pending applications, or to create a separate paragraph explaining the limitations. Archtrain 18:48, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
In the destination listing, should "international" change to "non-domestic"? China defines Hong Kong, Macau, and Taiwan as not international but "out of realm" (jingwai). I've seen the signs at Guangzhou Baiyun which points passengers to "International and HK/Macau/Taiwan" flights. HkCaGu (talk) 19:20, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
To my knowledge, only two formats (the classical list and the interactively sortable table) are approved by WP:AIRPORT. What's going on with this new table here? Aren't the flags and individual airport links too much? And the table looks ugly! HkCaGu (talk) 16:56, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
is missng the UA flight to San Francisco. That's the flight that I always take so I had to notice it. Pal2002 (talk) 03:06, 18 March 2010 (UTC) Many destinations are missing, e.g., Copenhagen, Teheran etc etc. Map should be updated or removed — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.224.153.7 (talk) 09:28, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
Recently while editing the intro I removed a line that read Pudong is the busiest international airport in China. I think the original intent of this sentence was that Pudong has the highest number of international passengers out of any airport in China, but saying it is the 'busiest international airport' implies that it has the greatest number of passengers of all international airports in China, which is evidently contradictory to an earlier sentence declaring it to be the third-busiest airport in China. Thus its removal. Re-insertion of the content to the former implication is fine. Colipon+(Talk) 13:17, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
A way to improve this article is to link the destinations to the article of the airports that serve them. Please do this change.72.89.35.142 (talk) 02:37, 20 July 2012 (UTC)
I follow your advice and improve the article with wikilinks. I have conflict with other editor, which he is VERY INSULTING ME. Please help me fix a poor situations! --B767-500 (talk) 04:22, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
I believe this was mentioned on a previous version of the article. Maybe a sentence or two on it or the rationale behind it?
References
((cite journal))
: Check date values in: |date=
and |year=
/ |date=
mismatch (help); Missing or empty |title=
(help); Unknown parameter |month=
ignored (help)
((cite web))
: Missing or empty |title=
(help)