Article (edit | visual edit | history ) · Article talk (edit | history ) · Watch
Reviewer: MathewTownsend (talk · contribs ) 21:26, 10 July 2012 (UTC) [ reply ]
review I've reviewed this article and made a few minor edits that you are free to change.[1] There is also a dead link marked that would be good if you could fix. Otherwise, the article clearly describes this particular siege.
GA review-see WP:WIAGA for criteria (and here for what they are not)
Is it reasonably well written ?
a. prose: clear and concise , respects copyright laws , correct spelling and grammar:
b. complies with MoS for lead , layout , words to watch , fiction , and list incorporation :
Is it factually accurate and verifiable ?
a. provides references to all sources in the section(s) dedicated to footnotes/citations according to the guide to layout :
b. provides in-line citations from reliable sources where necessary:
Assume good faith
c. no original research :
Is it broad in its coverage ?
a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic:
b. it remains focused and does not go into unnecessary detail (see summary style ):
Does it follow the neutral point of view policy .
fair representation without bias:
Is it stable ?
no edit wars , etc:
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
a. images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales :
no images available
b. images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions :
no images available
Overall :
Pass or Fail:
Pass
Congratulations! MathewTownsend (talk ) 22:59, 11 July 2012 (UTC) [ reply ]