Article (edit | visual edit | history ) · Article talk (edit | history ) · Watch
Reviewer: MayhemMario (talk ) 16:02, 12 May 2011 (UTC) [ reply ]
I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria , following its nomination for Good Article status.
Disambiguations : I found zero disambiguations. Well Done!
Linkrot : I found zero dead links. Well Done!
Checking against GA criteria[ edit ] GA review (see here for criteria)It is reasonably well written .
a (prose) : b (MoS ) :
One thing, the lead is a bit messy maybe split it into two paragrpahs and maybe add a caption for the picture?
It is factually accurate and verifiable .
a (references) : b (citations to reliable sources ) : c (OR ) :
All references are fine and no original research. Though there is no reception though looking on websites there isnt actually any which I can find either. MayhemMario (talk ) 16:02, 12 May 2011 (UTC) [ reply ]
It is broad in its coverage .
a (major aspects) : b (focused) :
Thorough and well focussed
It follows the neutral point of view policy .
Fair representation without bias :
It is stable .
No edit wars, etc. :
It is illustrated by images , where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales ) : b (appropriate use with suitable captions ) :
Maybe this is picky, on the development of Sol you could put a picture of Cole like with Vanessa Gold . MayhemMario (talk ) 16:02, 12 May 2011 (UTC) [ reply ]
Overall :
Pass/Fail :
Every thing is good, so I am happy to list this as a Good Article. Congratulations! MayhemMario (talk ) 18:01, 11 May 2011 (UTC) [ reply ]