Match table

[edit]

I have decided to remove the match list from the article. The table was already rather unwieldy and a full list would see over 100 entries which I believe is of little encyclopedic value. Looking at other derby pages, including the only GA class article I could find, none of these pages have a list of this magnitude. Kosack (talk) 20:27, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Changed my mind here. Kosack (talk) 20:48, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:South Wales derby/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: MWright96 (talk · contribs) 14:00, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Happy to review this article. MWright96 (talk) 14:00, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

General

[edit]

Lead

[edit]

Southern Football League

[edit]

Pre-war and wartime

[edit]

Post-war

[edit]

Lower divisions and hooliganism

[edit]

New eras

[edit]

Record

[edit]

Players for both clubs

[edit]

References

[edit]

The main issues of the article concern the prose and some content is not verified by some of the sources are in the incorrect position with a few references lacking certain parameters. On hold. MWright96 (talk) 16:23, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]