Thanks for starting a review on this article. I thought that the article would never get reviewed. Anyways, what are some things in the article that should be fixed? Statik N (talk) 19:15, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
hatred, ignorance and sexism -> Except for hatred, it is almost a copy-paste from the source.
Lyrics
There are too many quotes here, reduce them.
Promotion, release, commercial performance and touring
I suggest spliting release and commercial performance and merge it with Critical reception (and create an independent subsection {or subsections} like Misterioso (Thelonious Monk album)#Release and reception). Leaving it as Promotion and touring.
(RIAA)[3] on -> (RIAA),[3] on
File:Kittie Charlotte music video.jpg fails WP:NFCC#8 as there is no critical analysis of the image, or the music video. Although you "cannot show a picture of a music video through only words", you can describe it. In this still, there is no educational value that is lost. Also fails WP:NFCC#1 (marked as n.a), as free pictures of Atfield might exist that can replace the image.
File:Kittie Dynamo 2000.jpg fails the same criteria.
Citation 21 doesn't need an issue or volume because it doesn't have those. It's a book. Some of the citations that don't have an issue or volume or page doesn't have issues, volumes, or pages because I couldn't find them. Citation 32's last name is actually spelled as "vanHorn". As for the obscenity controversies in music category, there's the quote in the body: "Spit was controversial because of its song titles, which made many people think that the album's songs are about sex". Statik N (talk) 00:56, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]