GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Epicgenius (talk · contribs) 20:07, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Hi Lee Vilenski, I will take up this review. I'll read through this and leave some in-depth comments later. epicgenius (talk) 20:07, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    c (OR):
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):
    b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

Overall:
Pass/Fail:

· · ·


General comments

[edit]

Lead:


Career

Other sports

In other media

Legacy

Career finals

References

  1. ^ Friskin, Sydney (7 April 1981). "Davis can beat the system". The Times. London. p. 10.
  2. ^ Gary Clarke (2008). A Billiards and Snooker Compendium. Paragon )Publishing. pp. 20–. ISBN 978-1-899820-46-7.

POV and coverage

[edit]
As he is still alive, and only retired a short amount of time ago it's not huge. I suspect his legacy would have been more if it wasn't for Stephen Hendry coming around a few years later and changing the way the game was played. I suspect when he dies there will be a lot of obituaries on this. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 19:06, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

[edit]

That's all. I'll put this page on hold. epicgenius (talk) 18:01, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]