![]() | Stewards Society has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: April 3, 2024. (Reviewed version). |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | A fact from Stewards Society appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 16 April 2024 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Nominator: Etriusus (talk · contribs)
Reviewer: Averageuntitleduser (talk · contribs) 12:19, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
This seems like a fun one, comments should be done by the end of the day. Averageuntitleduser (talk) 12:19, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
Good Article review progress box
|
The drama, the intrigue, I can't lie this was quite entertaining! I did a hefty copyedit (which, by the way, watch out for "would" being used for past tense). Otherwise, I have surprisingly little to say:
The name collectively refers to a handful of loosely organizationally tied groups that have existed since the Stewards Society's founding in the 1980s— perhaps: "that have existed since the First Stewards Society", as otherwise, it's a bit self-referential.
The White Rose was loosely compared to Steward Throat— by who?
A variety of reliable local papers are used, student papers are sometimes used as sources, but this is okay per WP:RSSM. No copyvio issues during my spot-check, paraphrasing is used well, and Earwig shows a solid score of 24%, namely to attributed quotes and long titles.
I don't have much to say here, a look at Google News shows that everything major is in use. I couldn't find anything in Newspapers.com, nor in any books, except for a mention in Facing Georgetown's History. The Hoya has done a lot of coverage, but I'm comfortable with how it's limited to only when necessary. This Esquire article could be a lighthearted add to the "Reception" section, but I wouldn't call it critical.
A touchy subject, but I believe the article does a nice job at attributing the exposés and presenting the responses.
No recent content disputes or edit wars.
The two keys are symbolic of the society and are your own work. I don't think we could get many more images than that.
@Etriusus: courtesy ping, what an interesting rabbit hole! Great work so far. Averageuntitleduser (talk) 11:43, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was: promoted by Bruxton talk 19:08, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
Number of QPQs required: 2. DYK is currently in unreviewed backlog mode and nominator has 22 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.🏵️Etrius ( Us) 23:35, 3 April 2024 (UTC).