This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles
I'm afraid I'm going to have to return it. I don't see the tag as a bad thing - just as a means of letting editors know that some help would be appreciated. In this case, the Science World ref is a press release, so it doesn't help with notability. The new Business Insider one seems pretty decent, so that's great, but the other two seem to be self-published works - decent enough, but not much beyond blogs. Unfortunately Extravaganzi reads more like an advertisement or press release than something that can really be used to establish notability.Business Insider might be enough to pull through at AfD, but it is only really one source, and perhaps having the tag there will help point to the need for just a bit more. - Bilby (talk) 12:05, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
OK Bilby, I see your point, but I only removed it so as not to give any wrong impression to new or test editors. Thank you. —JOHNMOORofMOORLAND (talk) 12:30, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]