I saw it when I looked in to add the "failed GAN" tag. I agree, as you see, with the view there that the article is nowhere near GAN level yet. I hope someone (you, perhaps?) will bring expertise to bear to bring it up to standard. I much enjoy Lehrer's songs and I was very sad to have to quick-fail the article, but there was no alternative. Tim riley talk20:56, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
That was pretty much the reason I jumped in at talk—I'm a long-time (seriously, I'm old ) Lehrer fan ("Masochism Tango", anyone?). As you no doubt saw, I was thinking, given the exceeding likelihood that this was a drive-by nom, just deleting it rather than failing. Meantime, it's quite possible that I may take on the article someday. —ATinySliver/ATalkPage 🖖 21:17, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Over the last few weeks, I have been motivated to address nearly all of the concerns raised by
this GA review. Although I am relatively new to Wikipedia editing, and I am partially biased by
my own (uncited) collaboration with the subject of the article, I believe the "citation needed" qualms
have been addressed, partly because there is no dearth of material concerning Mr. Lehrer.
I also observe that the basic structure of the article is commendable after many collaborative
improvements. So in whatever way a re-review can be commenced, it will have the support of this editor.
James Alien Woods (talk) 03:15, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]