Triassosculda was nominated as a Natural sciences good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (January 25, 2024, reviewed version). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated.

A fact from Triassosculda appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 4 January 2024 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that until April 2023, when the genus Triassosculda was discovered, the mantis shrimp fossil record contained a gap of more than a hundred million years?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2024/January. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Triassosculda.

Wikipedia

Articles for creation

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 2 November 2023 by reviewer Theroadislong (talk · contribs).

Arthropods Low‑importance

	Arthropods portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Arthropods, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of arthropods on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArthropodsWikipedia:WikiProject ArthropodsTemplate:WikiProject ArthropodsArthropods articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Palaeontology Low‑importance

	Paleontology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Did you know nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 14:27, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that until April 2023, when the genus Triassosculda was discovered, there was an over 100 million year gap in the Mantis shrimp fossil record? Source: ^[1]
- Reviewed:

Created by Abdullah raji (talk). Self-nominated at 06:44, 5 November 2023 (UTC). Expanded by Olmagon (talk). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Triassosculda; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.[reply]

The article is not only still a stub, but it does not reach the 1,500 character count. Apparently, it's been a long time since your first failed DYK, so I would suggest getting familiar with the WP:Did you know/Guidelines for understanding article qualifications for DYK nomination because this article does not qualify. I understand that this taxon was just recently described this year and is only mentioned by one source as a result, but you need to make the article informative nonetheless. PrimalMustelid (talk) 10:43, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- The article was just 235 prose characters when I left an edit summary ping with a note that it needed to be expanded to 1500. It's now 1001. Abdullah raji, Olmagon, and Asparagusus, do you think you can expand it further within a few days? MANdARAX • XAЯAbИAM 17:32, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  - Mandarax: possibly, but this might be the only source as it was just recently discovered. I'll see what I can do. —asparagusus (interaction) ^sprouts! 17:37, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It's now 2115 prose characters, with 7 refs. (Thanks, Olmagon; you've been added to the credits.) PrimalMustelid, this is ready for a full review. MANdARAX • XAЯAbИAM 20:53, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Alright, I'm impressed by how quickly this nomination was saved by a group of editors. With that, I will rescind my rejection vote and make a quick review of the DYK nomination:

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: None required.

Overall: The fact for the DYK nomination is cited within the article, and a fossil to partially cover said gap within Stomatopoda in the paleontological record is interesting. No copyright violations according to Earwig's Copyvio. Looks good to go! PrimalMustelid (talk) 22:54, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ Smith, C.P.A.; Aubier, P.; Charbonnier, S.; Laville, T.; Olivier, N.; Escarguel, G.; Jenks, J.F.; Bylund, K.G.; Fara, E.; Brayard, A. (2023-03-31). "Closing a major gap in mantis shrimp evolution - first fossils of Stomatopoda from the Triassic". Bulletin of Geosciences: 95–110. doi:10.3140/bull.geosci.1864. ISSN 1802-8225.

GA Review[edit]

Unsuccessful. PrimalMustelid (talk) 17:03, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

GA toolbox
Copyvio detector Authorship External links
Reviewing
Templates Criteria Instructions

This review is transcluded from Talk:Triassosculda/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: PrimalMustelid (talk · contribs) 17:03, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This GAN nomination has been sitting around for nearly a month at this point, so I should address this as the reviewer. The reviewer in question only has 10.9% authorship on the nominated article, and they nominated it for DYK back when the article was inadequate until another user majorly expanded it. Even disregarding authorship, there's not enough content on this article to make it GA-worthy. Because the nominator does not share a large portion of authorship, I'm going to have to quickfail it. PrimalMustelid (talk) 17:03, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.