This article was previously nominated for deletion. The result of the discussion was delete.

This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Internet culture This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture articles WikiProject Internet culture To-do: edit history watch purge Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : View all requested internet culture articles Expand : Pick an article from here or here Photo : Category:Internet culture articles needing images Stubs : All stubs are located here Other : Category:Internet self-classification codes (!?); Try to get YouTube to FA; Tag all articles you find with ((WikiProject Internet culture)) See also Category:Internet culture articles needing attention

This is a brand new page. Please do NOT nominate this for speedy deletion. If you have any questions about this article's credibility, INFORM ME FIRST on my talk page.

In addition, if anyone would like to add an infobox to this article, you are welcome to do so.

Thanks. Edfilmsuk (talk) 21:07, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• I would like to warn you that your post kind of comes across as you showing WP:OWNERSHIP of the article because it sounds like you are telling people that they need your permission to do anything to the page. It's generally considered to be good manners to inform someone of speedy deletion after the fact, but other editors are under no obligation to tell you beforehand or to get your permission to do anything, as nobody owns an article on Wikipedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:12, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Duly noted. Edfilmsuk (talk) 20:14, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This page should stay up. I though wikipedia were on the right path at documenting a clearly well-known and interesting group of pranksters that have made national, regional and BBC news multiple times.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.31.47.182 (talk • contribs)

Good that there's references to news coverage of other pranks they have done beyond the pitch invasion, and I think notability should be re-evaluated in that context. However I suspect many Wikipedia editors will conclude it still doesn't meet the standards for an entry. Paulbrock (talk) 10:28, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notability does seem to be there now and I think many editors will actually agree with it staying, To be honest there's far more worse articles on here than this. –Davey2010^Talk 13:40, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

May not meet your personal notability standards, but it meets the sites notability standards, goodbye.--Theamazo (talk) 11:28, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]