Troop sleeper was one of the Engineering and technology good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | ||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Current status: Delisted good article |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
To-do list for Troop sleeper:
|
I think that your article is close to GA for a topic like this. The main problem I see it that it is one long section. I am sure that if it is broken up a bit, it will make it through to being a GA. Zoli Elo 04:41, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Last assessed in 2009. Multiple areas missing citations and I am concerned about depth and breadth of coverage as well. This exclusively covers WWII troop sleepers but I've found evidence [1] [2] [3] they were used in WW1 as well. Even if they weren't quite the same as the purpose-built WW2 sleepers, there should be at least some basic background information given. I am also not impressed with the small number of sources in the article. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 22:42, 4 May 2023 (UTC)