The concourse design allows an open view of the platforms, giving the station a "grand" feel.MOS:PUFFERY says that peacock words should be avoided. Make it more neutral without imparting information. ShiriEditsTalk 04:21, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Some of the sources come from first-party .gov websites (Ministry of Transport, Land Transport Authority, etc.). Add more reliable secondary or tertiary sources. SpodleTalk 00:46, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
In reply to this, there's actually not many independent sources on the station design and construction. It's not that of a significant station that warranted commentary by other media. It's a general problem for Singapore MRT stations in general. ZKang123 (talk) 00:49, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@ZKang123: Well I'm surprised that you, an actual native Singaporean and the person who nominated this article, responded to me. Well the point you made about MRT stations in Singapore not having big coverage is surprising to me. In my country, MRT (they have the same acroynm. that makes it more confusing!) are treated like they are building a skyscraper to rival the Burj Khalifa. You can easily find secondary or tertiary sources if you wanted to find sources for, say, the MRT-7. News channels here run morning news segments when a new train line is announced. That is a pretty big difference from my country's coverage and your country's coverage of rapid train stations. I wonder why news channels in your country don't have the level of coverage than what our news channels when a new rapid train station is announced. Are rapid transit are so ubiquitous that literally every single part of Singapore is covered by rapid transit? I'm curious to why that is the case. SpodleTalk 01:03, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Well, at this point the Singapore MRT spans almost the whole island. Plus, for this station, its part of a four-line extension through an industrial area, so it isnt totally big news compared to, say, a whole new line. Also, the Land Transport Authority isnt like willing to divulge too much technical information to the public for some reason. ZKang123 (talk) 01:36, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Change some subtitles. Change the location subtitle to something like "Location of Tuas Link station in Singapore".
'Construction progress of the station' captions should be improved. Clarify which part of the station was being built in captions (except 'Existing station exterior'). SpodleTalk 08:40, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Actually if you realise they are all taken from the same perspective. Improved captions accordingly. ZKang123 (talk) 08:49, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Overall:
Pass or Fail:
This article checks almost all the points for being GA. I'll recheck if this is satisfactory to pass GA. SpodleTalk 11:52, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I think this is satisfactory enough to get GA'ed. Can't deny this article a GA since this article checks all the points to be GA. Good article Sorry if it took too long for me to finish this GA. SpodleTalk 00:48, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Other
The extension consisted of four stations between this station and Tuas station (now renamed Gul Circle). Add link to Gul Circle MRT station.
The station serves developments such as Tuas Depot, Tuas Bus Terminal, Raffles Marina and Tuas Checkpoint. Unlink Raffles Marina due to the article not being made in English Wikipedia (as far as I am aware of). (PS: What is 'Raffles Marina'?) SpodleTalk 09:10, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]