Twerton Park was a good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones Date Process Result May 15, 2023 Good article nominee Not listed March 28, 2023 Good article nominee Not listed
Current status: Former good article nominee

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Football: England Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the English football task force (assessed as Mid-importance). Somerset Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Somerset, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Somerset on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SomersetWikipedia:WikiProject SomersetTemplate:WikiProject SomersetSomerset articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Event Venues (inactive) This article is within the scope of WikiProject Event Venues, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Event VenuesWikipedia:WikiProject Event VenuesTemplate:WikiProject Event VenuesEvent Venues articles

This review is transcluded from Talk:Twerton Park/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Lee Vilenski (talk · contribs) 15:24, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I am planning on reviewing this article for GA Status, over the next couple of days. Thank you for nominating the article for GA status. I hope I will learn some new information, and that my feedback is helpful.

If nominators or editors could refrain from updating the particular section that I am updating until it is complete, I would appreciate it to remove a edit conflict. Please address concerns in the section that has been completed above (If I've raised concerns up to references, feel free to comment on things like the lede.)

I generally provide an overview of things I read through the article on a first glance. Then do a thorough sweep of the article after the feedback is addressed. After this, I will present the pass/failure. I may use strikethrough tags when concerns are met. Even if something is obvious why my concern is met, please leave a message as courtesy.

Best of luck! you can also use the ((done)) tag to state when something is addressed. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)}

Please let me know after the review is done, if you were happy with the review! Obviously this is regarding the article's quality, however, I want to be happy and civil to all, so let me know if I have done a good job, regardless of the article's outcome.

Links

Prose

Lede

• You probably don't need to link England as it's a major landmass. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 21:38, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• The stadium is named after the surrounding area - this seems a bit obvious, no? Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 21:38, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• 8,840 1,006 - either there is something missing here, or this is the biggest stadium ever made. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 21:38, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Considering the lede comments about it being a non-Legaue football stadium, the opening paragraph before this doesn't state who actually plays there, which seems like a misnomer. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 21:38, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• It has been the home of Bath City F.C. since 1932. From 1986 to 1996 Bristol Rovers played at the ground following their departure from Eastville. - both teams played there? I feel this could be worded better. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 21:38, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Do we need to cite the women's team bit? Could we not cite that in the body? Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 21:38, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• We mention the highest attendance being almost double its current size, which might need explaining Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 21:38, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• The infobox states other teams that played at the stadium - should really be lede-worthy stuff.Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 21:38, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• ahead of the likes of, Charlton Athletic's The Valley, the Swansea.com stadium and Bristol City's Ashton Gate. - seems a bit promoy to me. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 21:38, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

General

Review meta comments

• I'll begin the review as soon as I can! If you fancy returning the favour, I have a list of nominations for review at WP:GAN and WP:FAC, respectively. I'd be very grateful if you were to complete one of these if you get time. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 15:24, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  Thanks very much! (You are doing a very good job!) About the record attendance, like many other English stadiums, Twerton Park has reduced in capacity significantly over the years, this is stated quite a bit in the history section.

  By the way just to let you know I’m trying to spend less time on Wikipedia, so I probably won’t be able to respond super quickly if that’s ok with you? Thanks for the help. Joseph1891 (talk) 23:28, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Joseph1891 and Lee Vilenski, any status on this review? With 6 weeks of inactivity, I'm tempted to close the nomination as a fail. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 01:01, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

    Sorry, I asked Lee a question ages ago but no response, I'm really trying to cut down my Wikipedia usage, didn't realise it was only me who had to do the review, if it is, just close it, as I definitely do not have the time currently. Hopefully the Bath City and Twerton Park articles get reviewed by someone else later down the line, as, it may sound arogant, but they are certainly good article quality maybe bar a few references. Joseph1891 (talk) 01:37, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]