GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Arconning (talk · contribs) 00:54, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I will be reviewing this article, comments will probably be finished in the next 48 hours! Good luck to the editors! Arconning (talk · contribs) 00:54, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Considering the amount of the issues within the article, I have to fail it. I wish for the editors to make the article up to standard before nominating it as a Good Article again so that it can pass the criteria. Arconning (talk) 15:11, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Prose

[edit]

Lede

[edit]

History

[edit]

Campus

[edit]

Administration and organization

[edit]

Academic profile

[edit]

Student life

[edit]

Athletics

[edit]

Notable people

[edit]
[edit]

Images

[edit]

Refs

[edit]

Spotchecks

[edit]

Misc.

[edit]
Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.