The article complies with the MOS:LEDE, MOS:LAYOUT, MOS:WTW, and MOS:WAF guidelines. There are no embedded lists within the article, so I am skipping MOS:EMBED. Overall, the lede's length is okay, and it summarises the article, the article has appropriate sections, and there are no biased words in the article.
I feel like another sentence in the lede about the game's development would be good to add.
Checking refs, verifiability, and whether there is original research.
References section with a ((reflist)) template is present in the article.
No referencing issues.
All references are reliable. Good job on archiving them.
Spotchecked Ref 2, 3, 6, 8, 11, 14–all verify the cited content. AGF on other citations.
Infobox: R.V.A., Joshua James San Juan, Dave Von David, Dominique Duran, Gerald Dizon, Adel Garangan, Sharlene Yap, Harold Pongco, and Kyle Patrick Naval are unsourced and not mentioned in the text.
Copyvio already checked.
Checking whether the article is broad in its coverage.
I've found two more sources that you could potentially add to the article (if they cover something that is not already in the article). See: Digital Trends and PSU.
"Despite the setting, Nulud wanted the setting to be universal" Why?
The rest of the article addresses the main aspects, and it stays focused on the topic.
Checking whether the article is presented from an NPOV standpoint.
The article meets the criteria and is written in encyclopedic language.
Checking whether the article is stable.
As noted in the initial comments, the article has been stable.
Checking images.
Images are properly licensed.
Optional: Add alt text to the image in the Gameplay section.