London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

UK geography Mid‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Philately List‑class Low‑importance

	Philately portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philately, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of philately and stamp collecting on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhilatelyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilatelyTemplate:WikiProject PhilatelyPhilately articles
List	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Coverage[edit]

Where do our definitions of the coverage of each sub-district come from? They seem rather limited. WC1E isn't just University College London buildings; WC1H isn't just St. Pancras (but it does cover some of UCL); and the term "Bloomsbury" can be applied to almost the whole of WC1, not just WC1B. Lfh 16:10, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WC1[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

The result was following centralised discussion, WP:UKPOSTAL was adopted, merge into WC postcode area. -- MRSC (talk) 04:30, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I propose merging London WC1 into this article. The postcode area is the smallest in the country in terms of districts, only two. The information can easily be accommodated in this article and a redirect created. It will reduce duplication and allow this article to grow. MRSC (talk) 11:34, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - Merging the content of this article would overwhelm the WC postcode area article. No need for a merger in this case. Jeni ^(talk) 11:45, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: - Rather than have sparse discussions on these articles spread across Wikipedia, I have suggested centralised discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject UK geography#Input requested: SE postcode area Jeni ^(talk) 12:08, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Redirecting to a centralised discussion, that encourages avoidance of a "one size fits all" policy is counter-intuitive and disrupts the individual merge discussions. MRSC (talk) 12:15, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support merge centralising individual post code stubs creates a substantional article; and avoids duplication of basic information about post codes. Post codes are merely a comment on the organisation of postal delivery, they contain no substantive information about the administration of districts - nor should they - since it is an unrelated subject. Kbthompson (talk) 13:04, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Defer until a common guideline has been agreed for UK postcode districts articles either all to be merged into sections within the articles about their postcode area, or all to be kept (and named consistently). — Richardguk (talk) 15:21, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.