Condensation of several parameters[edit]

The reason for this request has something to do with the article's size. I C this being applied to similar pages including windows 11 version history. In any case, there won't be any visual changes, just for the sake of decreasing the size of the page. Here are the changes:

Requested by 197.244.135.236 (talk) 01:30, 18 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

 Not done for now: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the ((Edit semi-protected)) template. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 03:31, 18 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
When I tested the changes in the WP:SANDBOX there were a total of 806 bytes removed (eight hundred and six). Moreover, when other users add patches to the end of tables, they would copy the last patch added above them, including the <br /> tags, before making modifications. Using <br> tags has four bytes, whereas <br /> has six bytes. If my request for changes gets discarded again then the size of the page will continue to increase greatly over time with the excessive use of unwanted spaces and quotation marks.197.238.159.62 (talk) 06:30, 18 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Wikimedia hosts a lots of severs.... as you know. If such small spaces become huge burden, oh, their reports on finical should be carefully reviewed. -Lemonaka‎ 12:06, 18 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
 Not done for now: Explained. -Lemonaka‎ 12:06, 18 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
It seems that U users don't seem to understand my points. I had to explain in details. The page gets updated twice every month, with the six-byte tag, <br />, being copied and pasted at one line after the other. If we have 2 six-byte tags added in one month then we have 12 bytes added. On the other hand, if we have 2 four-byte tags, <br>, added in one month then we have 8 bytes added. Thus, preventing the article to grow darn quickly in the future. How hard is this to understand? They have nothing to do with such irrelevant and invalid info about how wikimedia's servers operate.197.238.159.62 (talk)
Per H:BR, it doesn't matter which break line code is used. See Help:Table#Scope for your second request and Help:Section#Creation_and_numbering_of_sections for your third request. Callmemirela 🍁 16:45, 18 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
callmemirela, I clearly do understand that whichever method works. However, do U editors care about the size of this page? If U scroll to the top of this talk page U would realize the page was previously considered for deletion by georgia guy back in June 2018 due to the rapid growth of the article, in which nosebagbear and samboy suggested that the article be split, which eventually did happen.
The other problem is the amount of extra spaces and punctuations, which is the whole point of my doggone request, have been overused from time to time. A former editor, theTwoEyedMan, was the only user who came up with solutions to decrease the page size. Here ®️ some of its contributions to the article:
The above changes cleared over two kilobytes that time without even making any single visual change.197.244.236.124 (talk)
Please stop removing spaces on the talk page. Consensus right now, from users engaging into the conversation, is based on MOS, spaces are naturally to be included. There is no valid reason or policy to obsess over the size of the article. Additionally, please read WP:CANVASS; it is not a method to get your way. Callmemirela 🍁 19:59, 20 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Then please stop going against multiple consensus which have been reached multiple times. We cannot change the structure of the article secretly without starting another consensus. I understand that when a consensus is reached, those rules have to be observed indefinitely, unless there's another consensus which would attempt to reverse the previous consensus. Also, I am not WP:CANVASSing.197.244.236.124 (talk) 20:49, 20 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
This diff says otherwise. Consensus with this thread is that the current MOS remains, per three editors. Structure is not being changed secretly; I have no idea what tangent you're on with this. The discussion is open to the public. Furthermore, consensus is not set in stone. Callmemirela 🍁 21:30, 20 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Seriously? The structure is not being changed secretly U typed? If U ®️n't kidding me, then please explain how did those <br> tags were restored back to the original <br /> tags and how those deleted spaces before or after double or triple equal signs got added back. What I also understand is that WP:VEing does not allow an editor to change the code of WP:TEMPLATEs, WP:TAGs, WP:WIKITABLEs and etc. the user wishes to add, which is one of the reasons I prefer source editing instead.197.238.245.211 (talk) 22:01, 20 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@197.238.159.62@197.238.245.211 or anyone in this range, please stop your filibusters. This Wp:ER was declined per wikipedia:Snowball clause and more debating is just a waste of time. Sorry for not so civil. -Lemonaka‎ 23:30, 20 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Excuse me? Please go through and consider my relevant points before alleging the fact that I am editing with bad faith.197.238.245.211 (talk) 23:44, 20 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Blunders committed by xiejunmingsa[edit]

Can any other user fix that user's mistakes?

  1. In this revision, the user added the below lines:
|-valign=top
|style=background:#fef8c6|10.0.19044.3208<br /><ref name="1904x3208">((cite web|url=https://support.microsoft.com/help/5028166|title=July 11, 2023—KB5028166 (OS Builds 19044.3208 and 19045.3208)|website=Microsoft Support|publisher=[[Microsoft]]|access-date=July 12, 2023))</ref>
|KB5028166
|'''Release Preview Channel and public release:'''<br />July 11, 2023
|

The user should have added what editions are eligible to receive that patch. In this case, it is more relevant to have the above lines changed to the below lines: 

|-valign=top
|style=background:#fef8c6|10.0.19044.3208<br><ref name="1904x3208">((cite web|url=https://support.microsoft.com/help/5028166|title=July 11, 2023—KB5028166 (OS Builds 19044.3208 and 19045.3208)|website=Microsoft Support|publisher=[[Microsoft]]|access-date=July 12, 2023))</ref>
|KB5028166
|'''Release Preview Channel and public release:'''<br>July 11, 2023
|''This update is available for Education, Enterprise, IoT Enterprise, Enterprise LTSC and IoT Enterprise LTSC only.''

Because, according to the website attached above, the Home edition and respective Pro editions of 21H2 are no longer supported after 13 of June, 2023. Beginning July 2023, patches are available for all other editions I mentioned inside the above quote.

  1. Also, in this revision, the user added the below lines:
|style=background:#d4f4b4|'''10.0.19044.3208'''<br />((r|1904x3208))
|KB5028166
|'''Release Preview Channel and public release:'''<br />July 11, 2023

which have to be replaced with the below lines:

|style=background:#d4f4b4|'''10.0.19045.3208'''<br>((r|1904x3208))
|KB5028166
|'''Release Preview Channel and public release:'''<br>July 11, 2023

because 22H2 does not have the 10.0.19044 build no., that's for 21H2 instead. Its build no. is actually 10.0.19045.

Kindly fix those goof-ups.41.230.202.227 (talk) 16:22, 12 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

 On hold Checking. -Lemonaka‎ 01:43, 13 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
 Done -Lemonaka‎ 01:47, 13 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

22H2 last update for Win10[edit]

Per [1]https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/t5/windows-it-pro-blog/windows-client-roadmap-update/ba-p/3805227 22H2 will be the last Win10 release and it will only receive monthly security updates until the end of support on 10/14/2025. Colbyringeisen (talk) 16:35, 14 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 17 August 2023[edit]

Please add 10.0.19045.3324 KB5029244 in the 22H2 table. It is missing. https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/topic/august-8-2023-kb5029244-os-builds-19044-3324-and-19045-3324-46087102-62c2-4911-9896-da3c6f4d8b5c 148.129.71.54 (talk) 14:44, 17 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

 Done -Lemonaka‎ 17:34, 20 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

No mention of the major design changes which occurred between versions of Windows 10[edit]

I visited this page because I wished to known what versions of Windows 10 added the background blur effect, fluent design, OOBE and layout changes, etc. I was unable to find any mention of those things here. -A Fluffy Kitteh | FluffyKittehz User Profile Page 16:46, 31 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You are welcome to add them if you find a reliable source. Jtrevor99 (talk) 19:06, 31 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Categories