GA Review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: KGRAMR (talk · contribs) 22:44, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Vrxces (talk · contribs) 07:34, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Hey! Got here eventually. You probably know the gist of my turnaround/approach by now. VRXCES (talk) 07:34, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Review

[edit]

Does the article conform to the general standards of WP:VG articles including the WP:VG/MOS? Yes, impeccable as ever.

Is the article generally well-written? No errors found.

 Done -- Roberth Martinez (talk) 14:59, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Is the article broad enough in its coverage and contains reliable sourcing? The coverage is broad and well-researched as is usual for the articles you write.

Do the sources cited verify the text in the article? A spot check yielded nothing unusual.

Are media and links properly attributed and do not have copyright issues? All good here.

Any other personal opinions or miscellaneous feedback that may or may not be relevant to the nomination? See below:

Development

 Done -- More or less, yeah. Though i put the line you suggested in the head section of the article. Since the Jaguar Explorer Online and The Atari Times sources reporting Brigg's anecdotes say that the project was conceived as "Virtua Racing on the Atari Jaguar". Roberth Martinez (talk) 14:59, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Done -- I removed the info about the Extremist Pack release. I'll reintroduce it if a source discusses it (but i doubt it), especially since that prototype features names of real drivers not found in the final version. Roberth Martinez (talk) 14:59, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reception

References

[edit]
@Vrxces:I finished responding your inquiries. Let me know if there's anything else that needs to be looked into. Roberth Martinez (talk) 14:59, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Vrxces:Sorry for pinging you but i wanted to know if there's anything else that needs to be looked into the article. Roberth Martinez (talk) 18:21, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, apologies for the delay. I am stumped, I really think that there's not much for me to add. I hope this does not suggest laxity in the review - I think you will agree that your approach to articles and meeting the GA standard is somewhat higher than average! As ever, grateful for any feedback. VRXCES (talk) 22:54, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.