The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:05, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
Improved to Good Article status by MisterCake (talk). Nominated by MisterCake (talk) at 07:31, 27 June 2016 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy compliance:
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: I don't thin this article passes the GA criteria and have mentioned it at WT:GAN. I think we should wait to see whether or not the article is delisted speedily or not. Some of the problems (like bare URLs) aren't even acceptable in a DYK. Yellow Dingo (talk) 11:55, 27 June 2016 (UTC)