The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Miyagawa (talk) 11:57, 11 August 2012 (UTC)

Abutiu[edit]

Created/expanded by GreatOrangePumpkin (talk), GDK (talk). Nominated by GreatOrangePumpkin (talk) at 15:07, 5 August 2012 (UTC)

  • Yes, it was fully translated, this is an expansion. I perfomed many translations and none was opposed. It was imported the history from the German article, so the original history does not count. Regards.--Kürbis () 07:57, 7 August 2012 (UTC)

Someone with knowledge in the DYK process should re-review. It clearly meets the criteria. Regards.--Kürbis () 08:02, 7 August 2012 (UTC)

  • Good to go. AGF on single offline sourcing; hook sourcing is PDF accessible. The following has been checked in this review:
  • QPQ done by (GreatOrangePumpkin)Kürbis on August 5, 2012
  • Moved from Kurbis sandbox on August 4, 2012 and has readable prose of 2,557 characters
  • Hook is short enough at 55 characters, and referenced at end of sentence
  • NPOV, good article on Ancient Egypt
  • Duplication Detector run, no copyvio found
  • Every paragraph sourced
Maile66 (talk) 23:48, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
Yes translations from other wikis count as new articles.PumpkinSky talk 02:12, 11 August 2012 (UTC)