The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:28, 10 March 2019 (UTC)

• ... that Hulk Hogan was sued for $5 million by Richard Belzer for choking him unconscious with a sleeper hold and dropping him live on TV? Source: Hollywood Hulk Hogan. Simon and Schuster. pp. 152–156. ISBN 0743475569.
  • ALT1:... that Belzer v. Bollea was a $5 million lawsuit that featured a professional wrestler sued by a comedian for choking him unconscious then dropping him on live TV? Source: New York Times

• Reviewed: Washington Initiative 1639
• Comment: The ALT is an alternative in case the reviewer has any BLP concerns

Moved to mainspace by The C of E (talk). Self-nominated at 10:00, 21 February 2019 (UTC).

• @The C of E: New and long enough, Earwig detects no copyvios, QPQ done. I think the original hook is fine, given that it contains facts that are not in dispute. I'm concerned that a lot of the Background section is cited to a book by Hogan/Bollea, which cannot be considered neutral. Other sources should be used where available, or if the book is used as a source there should be an in-text attribution "According to Bollea". Antony–22 (^talk⁄_contribs) 22:32, 8 March 2019 (UTC)
  • @Antony-22: I have made the change of source now. The C of E God Save the Queen! (talk) 22:41, 8 March 2019 (UTC)

• Okay, both ALTs good to go, with original hook preferred. Antony–22 (^talk⁄_contribs) 01:18, 10 March 2019 (UTC)