The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Bruxton talk 01:37, 2 April 2024 (UTC)

Illieston House

Illieston House (2017)
Illieston House (2017)

Improved to Good Article status by Kj cheetham (talk). Self-nominated at 20:55, 10 March 2024 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Illieston House; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.

We are in WP:QPQ backlog mode. Double reviews are required.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 07:07, 17 March 2024 (UTC)

TonyTheTiger, a double review is not required in this case, as I have under 20 nominations (https://qpqtool.toolforge.org/qpq/Kj_cheetham). Thanks. -Kj cheetham (talk) 11:08, 17 March 2024 (UTC)

Sorry for the confustion.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 18:42, 17 March 2024 (UTC)

@Kj cheetham and TonyTheTiger: I do not see that in our article where the 2019 sale was the most expensive. I also do not think that bit is needed so I will WP:DYKTRIM and if you disagree we can carry on at dyk talk. Bruxton (talk) 01:35, 2 April 2024 (UTC)