The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 08:32, 12 September 2022 (UTC)

DYK toolbox

Midnights

(
)

Created by JuanGLP (talk). Self-nominated at 13:58, 29 August 2022 (UTC).

  • I agree, alt 1 sounds better to me. infsai (talkie? UwU) 18:54, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
  • I agree as well, alt 1 sounds better! — JuanGLP (talk) 00:12, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
  • What does this mean??? — JuanGLP (talk) 12:08, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
  • @JuanGLP: The Earwig copyright violation detector is saying that the article contains a large excerpt from the press release, so the tool reports a false positive (saying that a copyright violation is present when that is not the case). Epicgenius (talk) 12:50, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
  • Typically it is not best practice to include a full press release either, JuanGLP. None of the other albums that have made it to featured article status (where this one probably will one day) include one like that; examples 1989 (Taylor Swift album), Red (Taylor Swift album). Expanding beyond FAs, Reputation (album) doesn't either etc. Summarize or quote smaller portions as relevant, sure, but we don't need the whole press release at the top like that, I don't think. This is more of an editorial discussion than copyright, but my 2c. @Epicgenius: While normally a 51% rating would certainly have me suspicious, I think that this can be approved regardless given that it is a false positive considering the context; I've looked it over and the only flags are either quotes or the award show name (which is unavoidable, obviously). --TheSandDoctor Talk 13:58, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
  • @Epicgenius: + @TheSandDoctor: Well if it can't be a DYK, then that's okay. You should talk to Ronherry, he could be responsible for adding the quote, and I am not pointing fingers (still new to this, and yes I know I'll be my second/third year here). But I won't be disappointed if can't be DYK, I'll be okay. – JuanGLP (talk) 14:25, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
  • @JuanGLP: For what it's worth, the quote does not count toward this article's prose size. This is a new article and not a five-fold expansion, and the article will still be long enough for DYK even if you take the quote out. If you remove the quote, then there would no longer be an issue in regards to copyright (you can be be bold and just remove it). Epicgenius (talk) 14:30, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
  • Thanks for addressing my concern. —VersaceSpace 🌃 01:54, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
Category