The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:10, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

NSO Group

[edit]

Created by Samsara (talk), Brandon (talk), MZMcBride (talk), and Prioryman (talk). Nominated by Prioryman (talk) at 21:57, 27 August 2016 (UTC).

Review of NSO Group

 • No issues found with article, ready for human review.

Review of Pegasus (spyware)

 • Some issues found.

General comments

 • Some overall issues detected

Automatically reviewed by DYKReviewBot. This is not a substitute for a human review. Please report any issues with the bot. --DYKReviewBot (report bugs) 20:57, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

  • Indicated source with 30% chance of copyvio is in German, Wikipedia article is in English, so I'm gonna go with "no copyvio". Samsara 09:05, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
  • Both articles are new enough, long enough (the Pegasus article just over the minimum) and are within policy regarding neutrality, sourcing and paraphrasing issues. The hook is adequately interesting and appropriately sourced. QPQ has been met. Alansohn (talk) 02:26, 11 September 2016 (UTC)