The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 18:45, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Olivos metro station, Tezonco metro station

Tezonco–Olivos section
Tezonco–Olivos section

5x expanded by Tbhotch (talk). Self-nominated at 16:34, 7 May 2021 (UTC); new article by Sammi Brie (talk). Self-nominated at 19:46, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

  • @Tbhotch: Both pages have received new enough and large enough expansions, and a double-QPQ is present. The source in both articles (identical text) checks out and supports the claims in the article. I did have to improve both pages to make the writing more idiomatic, and the hook needs the same treatment. I'm particularly wondering if "Superior Auditor of the Federation" (which I had personally used in my work before) may be a better translation for the ASF, though I note that English-language published material is absolutely all over the place, for instance this OECD report uses three different translations (and I'm contemplating writing the missing article). This is basically ALT0 repackaged: Sammi Brie (she/her • tc) 06:39, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
ALT0a: ... that the Superior Auditor of the Federation of Mexico observed damage to an overpass between Tezonco and Olivos stations on the Mexico City Metro prior to its collapse in May 2021?
  • I have no objection to the wording on either of those, pending another reviewer since I've now contributed an article to the hook. Sammi Brie (she/her • tc) 18:26, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Hello! Taking on good faith the review that Sammi performed for the originally-nominated content, I will review the Superior Auditor article and ALT1. To wit: when it was added to this nomination, the article was newly-created. Length is well over the minimum, no issues with copyvio, POV, or reliable sources. I am taking the referencing on good faith as I don't speak Spanish, but on a spot check nothing screams of unreliability. The hook is interesting - the reader of course wonders why nothing was done about the damage. The picture is free-use and looks nice at a small size. We're good to go here. ♠PMC(talk) 19:48, 17 June 2021 (UTC)