- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 03:03, 1 August 2018 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Pharmacist-to-pharmacy technician ratio[edit]
- ... that the pharmacist-to-pharmacy technician ratio has generally increased as pharmacy technicians have become less like retail clerks and taken on more responsibilities? Source: "Initially, technicians had a very limited function, only serving as clerks or cashiers. Many states...maintained low pharmacist-to-technician ratios...However, technicians gradually began to take on additional responsibilities, including entering and filling prescriptions, reconstituting medications, and communicating with physician’s offices and insurance companies." (source)
- Reviewed: Ralph Smith O’bré
Created by Biochemistry&Love (talk). Self-nominated at 16:28, 1 July 2018 (UTC).
New enough and long enough and cites sources in-line. The prose avoids close paraphrasing and appears neutral. QPQ done. I think the hook is interesting. I couldn't find the fact that the "pharmacist-to-pharmacy technician ratio has generally increased" in the cited source. Did I miss it? Rachel Helps (BYU) (talk) 17:55, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
- Thank you for your review! Regarding the fact, note the past tense of "maintained" low ratios, followed by "However," implying that the ratios have increased over time. The source does not explicitly quote the hook, but the hook's fact is clearly supported by the text. I hope that explanation helps! ―Biochemistry🙴❤ 04:23, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
works for me. I give this nomination my stamp of approval. Rachel Helps (BYU) (talk) 15:39, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
