- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:44, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Sign stealing
- ... that in baseball, it is not against the rules to steal signs? [1]:
The consensus among players and coaches is that any code deciphering by uniformed personnel is part of the game, but when outside equipment -- electronic, mechanical or otherwise -- is used, that's crossing the line. The official MLB rulebook does not address sign-stealing, though a memo was distributed in 2001 telling clubs that technology "could not be used for communications or for the purpose of stealing signs or conveying information designed to give a club an advantage."
- ALT1:... that ...? Source: "You are strongly encouraged to quote the source text supporting each hook" (and [link] the source, or cite it briefly without using citation templates)
- Reviewed: IOU
Created by Muboshgu (talk). Self-nominated at 22:51, 17 November 2019 (UTC).
Article new enough, long enough, and adequately cited. Hook short enough, interesting enough, and also cited. Article appears to be neutral and free of copyright violations and plagiarism. I have done some formating to citations. The QPQ is still needed other than that it's good to go. ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 17:02, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
- CAPTAIN MEDUSA, sorry, forgot about this nom. QPQ is Template:Did you know nominations/Bank of the Metropolis. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:18, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
No problems, ready for DYK. ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 07:08, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
