The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Bruxton talk 19:29, 10 December 2023 (UTC)

The Oxford Guide to the Book of Common Prayer: A Worldwide Survey

• ... that historian Alec Ryrie said that The Oxford Guide to the Book of Common Prayer: A Worldwide Survey convinced him that "there is such a thing as 'Anglicanism' after all"? Source: Ryrie, Alec (2010). "The Oxford Guide to the Book of Common Prayer: A Worldwide Survey". Reformation. 15: 223-224.
  • Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Glitch Productions
  • Comment: QPQ to come

Created by Pbritti (talk). Self-nominated at 19:35, 23 November 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/The Oxford Guide to the Book of Common Prayer: A Worldwide Survey; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.

• I will review this article in the coming week! WatkynBassett (talk) 15:19, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
• The article was created on 22 November 2023 and nominated on 23 November 2023 and is thus eligible.
• The article has over 1,500 characters of readable prose.
• The article is adequately sourced. I did a spot check, and the content was covered by the source.
• The article is written in a neutral and non-promotional tone.
• Earwig did not pick up anything suspicions.
• QPQ provided.
• Hook review: The hook is interesting; it has the right length, and it is quoted inline. I see only one issue: The partly quoted sentence reads like this in full: "What it does achieve—and this is not insignificant—is to use the Book(s) of Common Prayer to tell Anglicanism’s story in a reasonably coherent way: so much so that it almost makes me suspect, against my better judgement, that there is such a thing as 'Anglicanism' after all." Saying that Alec Ryrie is convinced of Anglicanism after his reading of the book thus seems to go too far. So, I would suggest that one uses a slightly rewritten hook a bit closer to the actual wording (e.g. ... that it made Ryrie "suspect [...] that there is such a thing".
  • Result: Thank you, Pbritti, for creating such quality work. I will gladly tick this nomination if my slight quibble with the formulation of the hook is dealt with. WatkynBassett (talk) 19:45, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
    • @WatkynBassett: Below is an ALT1 based on your helpful and thorough review. Thank you! ~ Pbritti (talk) 00:21, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
      • ALT1 ... that historian Alec Ryrie said that The Oxford Guide to the Book of Common Prayer: A Worldwide Survey made him suspect that "there is such a thing as 'Anglicanism' after all"?
    • Best, ~ Pbritti (talk) 00:21, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
      • Perfect, @Pbritti:! I approve ALT1. WatkynBassett (talk) 06:29, 27 November 2023 (UTC)