The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:35, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

The Right Stuff (blog)[edit]

  • Reviewed: QPQ not required due to fewer than five DYK credits.
  • Comment: Article was previously merged and redirected; was completely rewritten by me with minor reuse of old content and more than 1500 characters of new, original prose. The WordsmithTalk to me 01:46, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

Converted from a redirect by The Wordsmith (talk). Self-nominated at 01:46, 2 September 2016 (UTC).

 • Some issues found.

 • No overall issues detected

Automatically reviewed by DYKReviewBot. This is not a substitute for a human review. Please report any issues with the bot. --DYKReviewBot (report bugs) 02:16, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

  • Looks good on all basic criterion. The missing cite noted above is simply a stub lead-in to a quote that is correctly cited. Read some of the articles pointed to by the copyvio tester and while they are all similar to each other, this article is not a scrape of them. Good to go! Maury Markowitz (talk) 21:15, 15 September 2016 (UTC)