The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 13:42, 7 August 2023 (UTC)

DYK toolbox
DYK check Reviewer instructions Earwig's Copyvio Detector QPQ check Character count A Simple Word Counter Reviewers' template Find sources (notability) Hook length

The Wizard of the Kremlin

• ... that The Wizard of the Kremlin depicts a fictional éminence grise of Vladimir Putin based on Vladislav Surkov, who was called one of Russia’s “most intriguing figures” by The New York Times? Source: “ But Mr. da Empoli wanted to try fiction and had a “fascination” with the way Russian power is projected. So he modeled his debut novel’s narrator on one of the country’s most intriguing figures, Vladislav Y. Surkov.” NY Times
  • Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Landrada

Created by Thriley (talk). Self-nominated at 20:43, 9 June 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/The Wizard of the Kremlin; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy compliance:

• Adequate sourcing: - There are some characterisations in the themes section that need citation. The epigraph section is unsourced and I'm not sure if it really adds something. I also can't find in the source where is mentioned "Vadim Baranov is the novel's exclusive narrator from chapter 3".
• Neutral: - The unsourced characterisations in the themes look a bit like a promotional brochure.
• Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: There is the problem with the unreferenced claims in the themes section. Earwig's tool gives a 92% similarity with a wordpress site, which however mentions that it is a translation from fr.wikipedia as is this article. Many sources are behind a paywall, so assume good faith for tthem. I think that it is also worth mentioning that this is the first novel of da Empoli. C messier (talk) 11:52, 2 July 2023 (UTC)

Thank you for your review. I’ll try to address the issues in the next few days. Best, Thriley (talk) 22:06, 6 July 2023 (UTC)

@C messier: I have fixed up the article fully now. I apologize for the delay. Best, Thriley (talk) 01:40, 3 August 2023 (UTC)

C messier (talk) 14:03, 3 August 2023 (UTC)